Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10122/2026 of KUMBLE AMRITH PRABHU Vs ASHWINI PADIYAR on 6 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010465972026 NC: 2026:KHC:41729 CRL.P No. 10122 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10122 OF 2026 BETWEEN: KUMBLE AMRITH PRABHU, S/O SRI. K. SRINIVAS PRABHU,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10122 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
KUMBLE AMRITH PRABHU,
S/O SRI. K. SRINIVAS PRABHU,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT A3-172,
DLF WESTEND HEIGHTS,
BEGUR, AKSHAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 068.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. P.P.HEGDE, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. YATHIN B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
ASHWINI PADIYAR,
D/O SRI. SATHISH PADIYAR,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT MANDAVI PRINCE PALACE,
NO. 106, TOWER B, AMBAGILU,
UDUPI - 576 105.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. DHANANJAY KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS)
PRAYING TO QUASH THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.06.2026
PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
JUDGE, FTSC-1, UDUPI IN CRL.A.NO.45/2025, WHEREBY THE
APPEAL FILED U/S 29 OF PWDV ACT, 2005 AND WAS
DISMISSED WITH COSTS VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO
QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2025 PASSED BY THE
LEARNED
PRL.
CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC,
UDUPI
IN
CRL.MISC.NO.41/2025 IN SO FAR AS THEY AWARD INTERIM
MAINTENANCE
OF
RS.80,000/-
PER
MONTH
TO
THE
RESPONDENT-WIFE VIDE ANNEXURE - B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned Senior counsel, Sri. P.P. Hegde, appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Dhananjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1.
2. Learned Senior counsel would submit that the petitioner would convert the subject petition to that of a Criminal Revision Petition.
HC-KAR
3. In the light of the said submission, the subject petition is permitted to be converted into Criminal Revision Petition.
4. For statistical purpose, the writ petition stands disposed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41