Karnataka High Court

WP/14303/2026 of SMT. PADMA Vs MR SRIKANTHA on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010310272026 NC: 2026:KHC:41944 WP No. 14303 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14303 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PADMA W/O. LATE T. PADMARAJU. AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 14303 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. PADMA

W/O. LATE T. PADMARAJU.

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.

2.

MR. SRIDHAR,

S/O. LATE T. PADMARAJU,

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

BOHT ARE R/AT.

SRI LAKSHMIRANGANATH NILAYA,

BEHIND SHIVAJYOTHI KALAYANA

MANTAPA, ADLIMANE,

HASSAN CITY.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. JAGADISH J.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

MR SRIKANTHA

S/O. LATE SRIPATHI,

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS.

2.

SMT. JAYASHREE

W/O. SRIKANTHA,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.

Digitally signed

by SUVARNA T

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

BOHT ARE R/O. HOUSE NO.11

NO.9293, NEAR JAIN TEMPLE,

DODDABASADI ROAD,

WARD NO.22, HASSAN CITY.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE

RECORDS IN EX. NO. 322/2026 BEFORE THE II ADDL. SENIOR

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HASSAN. SET ASIDE THE ORDER

DATED 08.04.2026 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND JMFC AT HASSAN IN EX. 322/2026 PRODUCED AS

ANNX-A AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE THE POSSESSION OF

THE PETITIONER SCHEDULE PROPERTY TO THE PETITIONERS

AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by the petitioners stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and that possession of the property has been handed over. Hence, the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

HC-KAR

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed

Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead