Karnataka High Court
CRP/652/2024 of SRI. SHYAM B R Vs SRI. T MUNI RAJA, on 3 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010553242024 NC: 2026:KHC:40514 CRP No. 652 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 652 OF 2024 (SC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHYAM B R (WRONGLY SHOWN AS SHYAM
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010553242024
NC: 2026:KHC:40514
CRP No. 652 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 652 OF 2024 (SC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SHYAM B R
(WRONGLY SHOWN AS SHYAM SUNDAR)
S/O LATE RAMA SANJEEVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
2.
SRI CHETHAN
S/O LATE RAMA SANJEEVIAH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
3.
SRI PAVAN
S/O LATE RAMA SANJEEVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT MARUTHI NILAYA
2ND MAIN ROAD
RAMANNA GARDEN
VIDYARANYAPURA
BENGALURU - 560 097
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R GOULAY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. T MUNI RAJA,
S/OLATE N THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.77/2, H.M.T. MAIN ROAD
GOKULA 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE
MATHIKERE
BENGALURU - 560 054
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY M., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010553242024
NC: 2026:KHC:40514
CRP No. 652 of 2024
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF KARNATAKA
SMALL CAUSE COURTS ACT 1964, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
DATED 12.07.2024 PASSED IN S.C.NO.1040/2021 ON THE FILE
OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, ACJM, C/C IX ASCJ AND ACJM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT
FOR EJECTMENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition on the ground that the execution petition itself has been withdrawn. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1