Karnataka High Court

WP/21688/2026 of M/S KALYANA KARNATAKA WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on 3 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010482762026 NC: 2026:KHC:40333-DB WP No. 21688 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 21688 OF 2026 (GM-POL)

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 21688 OF 2026 (GM-POL)

BETWEEN:

1.

M/S KALYANA KARNATAKA WASTE

MANAGEMENT PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED

FORMERLY M/S. MOTHER EARTH ENVIRON

TECH PRIVATE LIMITED

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER

THE COMPANIES ACT

(CIN:U39000KA2023PTC171808)

REG. OFFICE/AT AT SURVEY NO.13

CHALLAGHATTA VILLAGE

KENGERI HOBLI

KUMBALAGODU

BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK

AND ITS FACILITY AT PLOT NOS. 158-164

KIADB KADECHUR INDUSTRIAL AREA

REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

SAIDAPURA HOBLI

YADGIR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 585 221

SRI V.B. MADHU BABU

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI ANGAD KAMATH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

"PARISARA BHAVAN"

Digitally

signed by

AMBIKA H B

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

NO.49, CHURCH STREET

BENGALURU - 560 001

2.

THE CHAIRMAN

KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION

CONTROL BOARD

"PARISARA BHAVAN"

NO.49, CHURCH STREET

BENGALURU - 560 001

3.

THE ZONAL SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER

(DESIGNATED (OFFICER)

KSPCB, ZONAL OFFICE M.G.ROAD

SANTRASWADI

KALABURAGI - 585 101

4.

THE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER /

REGIONAL OFFICER

KSPCB, REGIONAL OFFICE

CHITTAPUR ROAD

YADGIR - 585 202

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI A. MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT

IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE

WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, CALLING FOR THE RECORDS AND

QUASHING THE THREE CLOSURE ORDERS EACH DATED

01.06.2026, NAMELY THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 33A OF THE

WATER ACT NO.../85 (ANNEXURE-A), THE ORDER UNDER

SECTION 31A OF THE AIR ACT NO.../86 (ANNEXURE-B), AND THE

ORDER UNDER SECTION5 OF THE EP ACT NO..../87 (ANNEXURE-

C) & ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning three closure orders, each dated 01.06.2026 issued by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board [KSPCB]. The said orders set out the reasons for issuing the closure orders in exercise of the powers under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 read with Rule 34 of the Karnataka State Board for the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution (Procedure for Transaction of Business) and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules, 1976; Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 read with Rule 20(A) of the Karnataka Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules, 1983; and Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read with Rule 4 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986.

2. The impugned orders are based on factual findings and we are unable to accept that any interference with the said orders is

HC-KAR

called for in the proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly states that he do not press any relief against the impugned orders. However, prays that a Committee be constituted to look into the compliances and suggest the measures that may be required to be taken.

4. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we direct that a Committee comprising of three members,

(1) Senior officer, Harazardous Waste Management Division, Central Pollution Control Board; (2)Senior Environmental Officer, KSPCB; and (3)the Member Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority, Yadagiri.

5. The Committee shall inspect the site and note the deficiencies and suggest the measures that may be required to address the said deficiencies. The Committee shall submit a report to KSPCB along with a copy of the same to be petitioner. The KSPCB shall examine the same and, thereafter communicate its

HC-KAR

final observations to the petitioner. KSPCB is also liberty to inspect the unit independently.

6. Needless to state that if the petitioner complies with all of the observations communicated by KSPCB, and if petitioner's unit complies with the same, KSPCB shall take necessary steps to lift the closure.

7. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE

AHB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead