Karnataka High Court
SCLAP/1/2026 of V PURUSHITHAM Vs KOMAL on 3 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010194612026 NC: 2026:KHC:40535 SCLAP No. 1 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH SUPREME COURT LEAVE APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2026 BETWEEN: V. PURUSHITHAM, S/O. VASUDEVA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
SUPREME COURT LEAVE APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
V. PURUSHITHAM,
S/O. VASUDEVA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT ATTIBELE VILALGE,
DEVANAHALLIL TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. E. S. SATISH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
KOMAL,
S/O. KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT C. M. CMOMPLEX,
1ST FLOOR, YELAHANKA STREET,
DEVANAHALLI TOWN
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
----
THIS IS SCALP (U/A 134(1)(c) OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA FILED BY ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING
THAT
TO
DETERMINE
AS
PER
ARTICLE
1(c)
OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, AS PER THE QUESTION RAISED
HEREIN THAT THE MATTER RAISED IN THIS CERTIFICATE
PETITION IS FIT ONE FOR APPEAL BEFORE HON’BLE SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA TO CHALLENGE THE LEGALITY OF THE SAID
FINAL ORDER/ORAL JUDGMENT TRANSACTED BY THIS HIGH
COURT ON 30.10.2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1883/2024
AND SAID JUDGMENT IS TO BE CERTIFIED AS AMENDABLE TO
APPEAL AND SECTION.393 OF CRPC BECAUSE SECTION.372
AND 386 AND CR.PC DO PROVIDE FILING APPEAL AGAINST
ORDERS OF TRIAL COURT BECAUSE IT IS LAW AS PER
CHAPTER XXIX OF CR.PC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Case called out.
2. No representation on behalf of the parties.
3. Accordingly, this matter stands dismissed.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7