Karnataka High Court

SCLAP/1/2026 of V PURUSHITHAM Vs KOMAL on 3 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010194612026 NC: 2026:KHC:40535 SCLAP No. 1 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH SUPREME COURT LEAVE APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2026 BETWEEN: V. PURUSHITHAM, S/O. VASUDEVA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

SUPREME COURT LEAVE APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

V. PURUSHITHAM,

S/O. VASUDEVA,

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

R/AT ATTIBELE VILALGE,

DEVANAHALLIL TALUK,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. E. S. SATISH., ADVOCATE)

AND:

KOMAL,

S/O. KRISHNAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

R/AT C. M. CMOMPLEX,

1ST FLOOR, YELAHANKA STREET,

DEVANAHALLI TOWN

Digitally

signed by

SUSHMA

LAKSHMI B

S

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENT

----

THIS IS SCALP (U/A 134(1)(c) OF THE CONSTITUTION

OF INDIA FILED BY ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING

THAT

TO

DETERMINE

AS

PER

ARTICLE

1(c)

OF

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, AS PER THE QUESTION RAISED

HEREIN THAT THE MATTER RAISED IN THIS CERTIFICATE

PETITION IS FIT ONE FOR APPEAL BEFORE HON’BLE SUPREME

COURT OF INDIA TO CHALLENGE THE LEGALITY OF THE SAID

FINAL ORDER/ORAL JUDGMENT TRANSACTED BY THIS HIGH

COURT ON 30.10.2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1883/2024

AND SAID JUDGMENT IS TO BE CERTIFIED AS AMENDABLE TO

APPEAL AND SECTION.393 OF CRPC BECAUSE SECTION.372

AND 386 AND CR.PC DO PROVIDE FILING APPEAL AGAINST

ORDERS OF TRIAL COURT BECAUSE IT IS LAW AS PER

CHAPTER XXIX OF CR.PC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Case called out.

2. No representation on behalf of the parties.

3. Accordingly, this matter stands dismissed.

Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead