Karnataka High Court
WP/36219/2025 of SRI. MALLESH Vs SMT. SUDHA N.H on 3 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010775302025 NC: 2026:KHC:40518 WP No. 36219 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 36219 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. MALLESH S/O HONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 36219 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MALLESH
S/O HONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/AT NARANAPURA VILLAGE,
ANEEREE POST, PANCHANAHALLI HOBLI,
KADUR TALUK,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 523
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MARUTHI G.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. SUDHA N.H.
D/O HONNAPPA,
W/O RAJASHEKARA,
HOUSE-WIFE,
R/O SOPPENAHALLI VILLAGE,
HIRESADARAHALLI POST,
KANAKATTEHOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 103
HONNAPPA S/O LATE DODDAPPA @ DODDAIAH
SINCE DEAD BY LRS.,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. SHARADAMMA,
W/O LATE HONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/AT NARANAPURA VILLAGE,
ANEEREE POST, PANCHANAHALLI HOBLI,
KADUR TALUK,
CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 523.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO(A) ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 09/10/2025
PASSED BY THE HONBLE IN THE COURT OF 2ND ACJ AND JMFC
AT KADUR IN EX NO.91/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE
THE ENTIRE PROCEEDING OF EX NO.91/2023 (PRODUCED AT
ANNEXURE-F) AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 09.10.2025, whereby the Trial Court has re- issued the delivery warrant and directed the PSI, Panchanahalli, to provide police protection to the bailiff for the execution of the delivery warrant, if steps were taken by 09.10.2025, in the order dated 19.09.2025.
HC-KAR
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before the Court the e-Courts online copy, which shows that, by order dated 10.12.2025, the Trial Court recorded that the bailiff had executed the delivery warrant on 11.11.2025, and that the DHR and his counsel had filed a memo seeking closure of the execution petition as fully satisfied. In view of the said memo, the execution petition was closed as fully satisfied.
3. The memo is taken on record.
4. In the light of the fact that the execution petition has already been closed, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition.
5. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
HC-KAR
ii. It is open to the petitioner to avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. iii. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5