Karnataka High Court
WP/26097/2024 of MANJUNATHA B Vs MRS. CHANDRASHEKARAMMA on 3 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010556592024 NC: 2026:KHC:40513 WP No. 26097 of 2024 C/W WP No. 26212 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 26097 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 26212 OF
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 26097 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
C/W
WRIT PETITION NO. 26212 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
IN WP No. 26097/2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MANJUNATHA B
S/O M V BANGARAIAH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT MEDAHALLI EXTENSION
VIRGONAGAR POST
BENGLAURU - 560 049
2.
ANIL KUMAR N
S/O B N NARAYANASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT BEHIND URDU SCHOOL
MEDAHALLI EXTENSION
VIRGONAGAR POST
BENGLAURU - 560 049
3.
KRISHNAPPA
S/O MUNIPAPAIAH
AGED 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.21, VEERANAHALLI
VIRGONAGAR POST
BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560049
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
MRS. CHANDRASHEKARAMMA
D/O LATE SHIVANNA
W/O SHIVARUDRAIAH
AGED 76 YEARS,
2.
SHIVARUDRAIAH
S/O LATE EDYRUAPPA
AGED 93 YEARS,
3.
SWAMY S K S
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y
AGED 59 YEARS,
4.
SHIVAPRASAD
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH
AGED 56 YEARS,
5.
SHIVAMURTHY S
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y
AGED 45 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT NO.49
MEDAHALLI EXTENSION,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
BENGALURU - 560 049
…RESPONDENTS
(R1 TO R5 ARE SERVED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WHEREFORE, THE
PETITIONERS HUMBLY PRAY THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY
BE
PLEASED
TO
CALL
FOR
THE
RECORDS
IN
O.S.NO.1642/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU
AND ETC.
HC-KAR
IN WP NO. 26212/2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MANJUNATHA B
S/O M V BANGARAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT MEDAHALLI EXTENSION,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
BENGALURU - 560 049
2.
ANIL KUMAR N
S/O B N NARAYANASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT BEHIND URDU SCHOOL,
MEDAHALLI EXTENSION,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
BENGALURU - 560 049
3.
KRISHNAPPA
S/O MUNIPAPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.21, VEERANAHALLI,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 560 049
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MRS. CHANDRASHEKARAMMA
D/O LATE SHIVANNA,
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
2.
SHIVARUDRAIAH
S/O LATE EDYRUAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS,
3.
SWAMY S K S
HC-KAR
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
4.
SHIVAPRASAD
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
5.
SHIVAMURTHY S
S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT NO.49, MEDAHALLI EXTENSION,
VIRGONAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560049
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA REDDY T., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
RECORDS IN OS NO. 1642/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, AT
BENGALURU,
QUASH
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 17.09.2024 (ANNEXURE-F) PASSED ON IA NO. 1 UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC IN OS NO. 1642/2024, FILED BY THE PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU, WHEREIN THE HONBLE COURT HAS REFUSED TO GRANT AN EX-PARTE ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND ORDERED TO ISSUE NOTICES ON IA -1 TO THE RESPONDENTS, BY A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER, CONSEQUENTLY.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed stating that the suit itself has been withdrawn on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing survives for consideration in these writ petitions.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3