Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/1273/2026 of VINOD RAJ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 3 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010512302026 NC: 2026:KHC:40534 CRL.A No. 1273 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1273 OF 2026 (C) BETWEEN: VINOD RAJ, S/O. ANTHONY RAJ, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1273 OF 2026 (C)
BETWEEN:
VINOD RAJ,
S/O. ANTHONY RAJ,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
R/AT 4TH CROSS,
BEHIN MAHENDRA SHOWROOM,
SHANTHINIKETHANA LAYOUT,
ARAKERE, B.G.ROAD,
BANGLAORE – 560 076.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. KRISHNE GOWDA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
STATE BY HSR LAYOUT POLICE,
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JAVEED S., HCGP)
----
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 374(2) CR.PC (FILED U/S
415(2) OF BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT SENTENCE DATED
19.11.2021, PASSED BY THE LIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU, IN SC.NO.1069/2014 OF
HSR LAYOUT POLICE, CONVICTING THE ACCUSED NO.3 FOR
THE OFFENCES P/U/S 376, 376(A), 376(D), 394, 307, 370(2)
OF IPC AND 4, 5, 6 OF ITP ACT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 03.08.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo is accepted and taken on record.
2. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM/-