Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/803/2026 of SRI BHASKAR S U Vs SMT LAKSHMI Y N on 31 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010340672026 NC: 2026:KHC:40075 CRL.RP No. 803 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 803 OF 2026 (397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI BHASKAR S U S/O MR.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 803 OF 2026
(397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SRI BHASKAR S U
S/O MR. S.G. UMASHANKAR
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT NO.24/25, 1ST MAIN ROAD
NEAR OLD PAPER MART, SRINIDHI LAYOUT
KONANAKUNTE, BENGALURU - 560062.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. APOORVA N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT LAKSHMI Y N
W/O MR. R. SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT NO.16, 6TH CROSS
KUVEMPU NAGAR, DODDAKALASANDRA
KANAKAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU-560062.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. NATARAJA K., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION
PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT IN C.C.NO.11294/2019 ON THE
FILE OF THE II A.C.J.M BENGALURU RURAL DIST. BENGALURU
AND CONFIRMED BY THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT IN
CRL.A.NO.106/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AND
ETC.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. This Court vide order dated 19.05.2026 has suspended the sentence subject to petitioner depositing further 30% of the fine amount before the Trial Court within four weeks. Inspite of this direction, the same is not complied with. On perusal of the judgment of the Trial Court, in paragraphs 17 and 19, it has taken note of the defence which was taken by the revision petitioner that there was a transaction between him and DW2. According to the accused, he had transaction with DW2, but DW2 comes before the Court and denies the same. The Trial Court having taken note of the defence and also the cross examination in paragraphs 17 and 19 and so also in 23 has come to the conclusion that the defence was not substantiated. The same is also taken note by the First Appellate Court in Crl.A.No.106/2025. There is no any probable evidence as such in the case.
HC-KAR
2. No ground is made out to entertain the revision petition and hence, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 31