Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/1794/2026 of SRI MANISH WALI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 31 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010083882026 NC: 2026:KHC:40253 CRL.P No. 1794 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1794 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI MANISH WALI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O RAVINDER
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1794 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MANISH WALI
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
S/O RAVINDER KUMAR WALI
R/AT FLAT NO.103
KANARE PRIMA APARTMENTS
KUMARAPALLI
THUBARAHALLI MAIN ROAD
RAMAGONDANAHALLI
WHITEFIELD BENGALURU - 560 066
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT: SOFIYA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY WHITEFIELD WOMEN POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY
LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE - 560 001
2.
SMT. DEEPA KAUL
W/O MANISH WALI
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT FLAT NO. B-605
NYDHILE RESIDENCY
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
GOTTIGERE BEGUR HOBLI
BANNERGHATA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 083
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI: SYED KHALEEL PASHA, ADV FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNSS) BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO. 112/2025 OF
1ST RESPONDENT WHITEFIELD WOMEN POLICE STATION, FOR
THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 85, 88 READ
WITH 3(5) OF BHARATIYA NYAYE SANHITA (BNS), 2023 AND
SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, (DP) 1961
PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE,
MAYOHALL,
BENGALURU,
AGAINST
THE
PETITIONER (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
"The petitioner submits that, during the pendancy of the above case, the Respondent Police has now filed charge sheet. Therefore, the petitioner craves leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above petition with
HC-KAR
liberty to challenge the chargesheet, in the interest of justice and equity."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
HR List No.: 5 Sl No.: 2