Karnataka High Court

WA/252/2026 of THE UNION OF INDIA Vs SMT. KUNHAMINA HAJJUMMA on 31 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010066752026 NC: 2026:KHC:40555-DB WA No. 252 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 252 OF 2026 (T-IT) BETWEEN: 1. THE UNION OF

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

AND

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

WRIT APPEAL NO. 252 OF 2026 (T-IT)

BETWEEN:

1.

THE UNION OF INDIA

REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

MINISTRY OF FINANCE,

JEEVANDEEP BUILDING,

SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110001.

2.

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,

WARD-6(2)(1), BMTC BUILDING,

80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK,

NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE,

KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y. V., ADV.)

AND:

1.

SMT. KUNHAMINA HAJJUMMA

W/O. LATE HAJI KK HUSSIAN

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

R/AT NO.140/5-1,

MUNISWAMAPPA ROAD,

MUNIREDDYPALLYA, J.C. NAGAR,

BENGALURU - 560006.

2.

THE GENERAL MANAGER

(LAND ACQUISITION AND ESTATE)

BMRCL BMLTC COMPLEX,

3RD FLOOR, KKH ROAD,

SHANTINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. USMAN P., ADV. FOR C/R1)

Digitally signed by

NANJUNDACHARI

Location: High

Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH

COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE

LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.30342/2025 DATED 27/10/2025

AND PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS.

THIS

APPEAL,

COMING

ON

FOR ORDERS,

THIS

DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT

AND

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)

Heard learned senior standing counsel Sri.Y.V.Raviraj for appellants/Revenue and learned counsel Sri.Usman.P., for respondent/assessee through video conference. Perused the entire writ appeal papers.

2. The respondent/assessee was before the learned Single Judge questioning Annexure-B – notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2019-20 and had also sought for a writ of mandamus directing the BMRCL – second respondent herein to pay compensation in lieu of TDS effected together with interest as applicable from the date of TDS till date. Learned Single

HC-KAR

Judge following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED VS. SRI BALAJI CORPORATE SERVICES AND OTHERS in W.A.No.890/2022 and connected matters dated 27.09.2023 allowed the writ petition.

3. In BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED (supra), the Co-ordinate Bench has held that the tax cannot be deducted from the compensation amount paid towards acquisition of land and such person who receives compensation on acquisition of his land would be entitled to claim exemption from payment of income tax.

4. Learned counsel Sri.Y.V.Raviraj for appellants/Revenue would submit that the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED (supra) is challenged and the same is pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP(C).No.3799/2024.

HC-KAR

5. To the Court’s query, learned counsel for the appellants/Revenue would submit that there is no stay of the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 also submits that the order of the learned Single Judge is already complied with, by refunding the tax collected.

7. In the above circumstances, we do not find any error or illegality in the order passed by the learned Single Judge, that too, following the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED (supra). Accordingly, writ appeal stands rejected.

Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE

Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE

NC CT:bms

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead