Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/824/2026 of SRI. MITHUN R Vs SRI. C. PAVAN on 31 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010346392026 NC: 2026:KHC:40070 CRL.RP No. 824 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 824 OF 2026 (397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI. MITHUN R S/O J
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 824 OF 2026
(397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SRI. MITHUN R
S/O J RAMACHANDRAIAH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
R/AT RAMAPURA VILLAGE
VIRGONAGARA POST
BIDARAHALLI HOBLI
BENGALURU EAST TALUK
BENGALURU 560 049.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHANKAR BASAWARAJ., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. C. PAVAN
S/O G CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT OLD NO.858/1, NEW NO.2
2ND CROSS, SUBBAYYANAPALYA
BANASAWADI MAIN ROAD
BENGALURU 560 033.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.GURUVA REDDY., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED: 01.04.2026 THEREIN CONFIRMING THE
JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE
DATED: 02.04.2024 IN CC.NO.54803/2023 ON THE FILE OF
XIV ACMM COURT, MAYO HALL UNIT, AT BENGALURU, SAID
CRIMINAL
CASE
BE
DISMISSED
AND
PETITIONER
BE
ACQUITTED OF THE CHARGES U/S 138 OF N.I ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. This Court vide order dated 21.05.2026 suspended the sentence subject to petitioner depositing further 30% of the fine amount before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks and the same has not been deposited. Thereafter, an application i.e., I.A.2/2026 was filed seeking extension of time. On 30.06.2026, for the reason stated in the affidavit, I.A.2/2026 was allowed and one week time was granted to deposit the amount and ordered to list the matter on 09.07.2026. Thereafter, when the
HC-KAR
matter was listed before this Court on 09.07.2026, one more application was filed seeking extension of time. Hence, this Court granted one week time and has taken note of the fact that on previous occasion also one week time was granted and accordingly, directed the revision petitioner to deposit the amount within one week from 09.07.2026 and also referred the matter to the Lok Adalath and even directed both parties to be present on the said date and if the matter is not settled before the Lok Adalath, ordered to list the matter before this Court on 21.07.2026.
2. Even though this Court directed and extended time twice to deposit the amount, the order is not complied with. Hence, no grounds are made out to entertain this revision petition in view of non-compliance of the order. Even when the matter was referred to the Lok Adalath, the same was not settled. Hence, it is clear that the revision petitioner is not diligent in complying with the order passed by this Court even when lenience was shown by
HC-KAR
this Court twice by extending the time to deposit the amount.
3. Under the circumstances, no ground is made out to consider this revision petition in view of violation of the conditional order and also non compliance of the order and also the revision petition is not yet admitted and no grounds are found to entertain the same.
4. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 32