Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1561/2025 of M/S PICTURE BOX COMPANY Vs M/S R J RISHIKARAN PROJECTS PVT LTD on 31 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010680822025 NC: 2026:KHC:40190 CRL.RP No. 1561 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1561 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S PICTURE BOX COMPANY OFFICE AT NO.249,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1561 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S PICTURE BOX COMPANY
OFFICE AT NO.249, KAMARAJAPURAM
NUNGAMBAKAM, CHENNAI-600034
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
SRI. WILLIAM ALEXANDER
2.
MR. WILLIAM ALEXANDER
SON OF W.C.THOMAS
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.249
KAMARAJAPURAM
NUNGAMBAKAM
CHENNAI- 600 034
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAHUL CARIYAPPA K S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S R J RISHIKARAN
PROJECTS PVT LTD
OFFICE AT PENT HOUSE
RJ MANOR APARTMENTS
11/A, 80 FEE ROAD
3RD CROSS, KORAMANGALA
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BENGALURU-560 034
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
SRI. RATHNAKAR SHETTY
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI SATHISHA M N, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S
438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT
AND ORDER DATED 10.07.2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE
LXXIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL
UNIT,
BENGALURU
(CCH-74)
AT
BANGALORE
IN
CRL.A.NO.25136/2024 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court shown lenience to the petitioner when he was secured before the Court issuing NBW, made the part payment and also undertaken to pay the balance amount on the next date of hearing. But, on release, the petitioner is not pursuing the matter diligently and even did not choose to appear before this Court and also did not assist the counsel on record and balance payments are also not made. When such being the
HC-KAR
case, in view of non-pursuing of this revision petition and also not making a balance payment, the question of considering this revision petition does not arise. This revision petition is also not admitted. Hence, revision petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of main petition, I.A. if any, does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN