Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/15768/2025 of ABDUL SYEED Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 30 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010747722025 NC: 2026:KHC:40192 CRL.P No. 15768 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15768 OF 2025 BETWEEN: ABDUL SYEED, S/O ABDUL SUBAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15768 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
ABDUL SYEED,
S/O ABDUL SUBAN,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 747, 2ND CROSS,
REHMANIA STREET, CHAMARAJA MOHALA,
MYSURU-577019.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LETHIF B, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY WOMEN POLICE STATION,
MYSURU, REP. BY SPP,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
KANEEZA RAHEEMA,
W/O. ABDUL SYEED,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 483, 9TH CROSS,
RAJEEV NAGARA, MYSURU-577019.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC.NO.114/2021 ON
THE FILE OF VII ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498(A), 504, 506 R/W 34
OF IPC, U/S 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.114/2021, pending before the VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru, for the offences under Sections 498A, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. Heard Sri.Lethif B, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt.Waheeda M.M., learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1 and have perused the material on record.
3. The parties to the lis have settled the dispute among themselves and have filed a Compromise Petition before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysuru in O.S.No.86/2024. The said Compromise Petition reads as follows:
HC-KAR
“COMPROMISE PETITION FILED ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT UNDER ORDER 23 RULE 3 OF C.P.C. It is submitted on behalf of both the parties as follows:
1. That the petitioner has filed the above petition for dissolution of Marriage held between both the parties.
2. That on the advice of elders and well-wishers of the parties, the parties have settled their petition out-side the court.
3. That the respondent has agreed to give Rs.1,50,000/- towards permanent alimony to plaintiff and the plaintiff has agreed to receive the said amount.
4. It is further agreed that the respondent has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month to the baby male child namely Mohammed Saad up to his majority has maintenance.
5. It is further submitted that, the baby male child will be under the care and custody of plaintiff's mother namely Shaheen Taj as natural guardian.
6. It is further submitted that, the plaintiff will withdraw all the cases filed against defendant and also agreed to withdraw the criminal case filed against the defendant and their family members in C.C. No.114/2021 before the file of VII Addl. Civil Judge at Mysuru.
7. It is further submitted that, the plaintiff has agreed towards visiting rights of the baby male child namely Mohammed Saad monthly twice at Saturday evening at nearby park of plaintiff residence.
8. It is further submitted that, both the plaintiff and defendant have agreed to dissolve the marriage held between them at Zam Zam Function Hall, dated 06.07.2018.
Wherefore, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to record the terms and compromise and order / decreed the petition, in the interest of justice and equity.”
HC-KAR
4. In the light of settlement arrived at between the parties to the lis and Compromise Petition as quoted supra being filed, I deem it appropriate to terminate the proceedings against the petitioner in the subject petition.
5. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:
ORDER
[I] Criminal Petition is disposed. [II] Proceedings in C.C.No.114/2021, pending before the VII Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru, stands quashed qua the petitioner.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77