Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/609/2026 of KAMALESH Vs RAVIKUMAR on 30 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010263572026 NC: 2026:KHC:39763 CRL.RP No. 609 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.609 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. KAMALESH S/O KAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.609 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
KAMALESH S/O KAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
RESIDING AT 7TH MAIN ROAD
KUNAGAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST
KOLLEGAL TALUK
CHMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SATHISH P., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
RAVIKUMAR
S/O DODDAMALLAIAHA @ MALLAIAH NAIK
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
RESIDING AT PALYA VILLAGE
KOLLEGAL TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. P. MAHADEVASWAMY, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT DTD 06.12.2025
PASSED
BY
THE
PRL.CIVIL
JUDGE
AND
JMFC
IN
CC.NO.625/2017 AND TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT DTD
13.03.2026 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGARA (SITTING AT KOLLEGAL) IN
CRL.A.NO.5001/2026 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FROM THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 30.04.2026 suspended the sentence of the petitioner, subject to depositing 50% of the fine amount, including the fine amount already deposited within a period of four weeks.
2. This Court also received the records and the amount is not deposited before the Trial Court within four weeks and also no representation on behalf of the petitioner before this Court.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent also submits that conditional order passed by this Court is not complied with.
4. When such being the case, the conditional order has not been complied with and no representation on behalf of the petitioner before the Court and the revision petitioner is also not pursuing the matter diligently.
HC-KAR
Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33