Karnataka High Court

WA/2115/2025 of KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs H S CHANNAPPA on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010843912025 NC: 2026:KHC:39725-DB WA No. 2115 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 2115 OF 2025 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA STATE

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

WRIT APPEAL NO. 2115 OF 2025 (L-KSRTC)

BETWEEN:

KARNATAKA STATE ROAD

TRANSPORT CORPORATION

MANGALORE DIVISION

MANGALORE BEJAI

MANGALORE-575104

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER.

…APPELLANT

(BY MS. RENUKA H.R., ADVOCATE)

AND:

H.S. CHANNAPPA

S/O SUBBAYYA GOWDA

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

R/O HANNAGUNDI VILLAGE

SANKADA HOLE POST

THIRTHAHALLI TALUK

SHIMOGGA DISTRICT-577201.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. V.S. NAIK, ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA

HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE

LEARNED

SINGLE

JUDGE

DATED

18.06.2025

IN

W.P.

Digitally

signed by

VASANTHA

KUMARY B

K

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

No.34965/2018 C/W WP 996/2019, CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW

THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANT IN THE

INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present appeal is preferred by the Karnataka Road State Transport Corporation being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 18.06.2025 passed in W.P.No.996/2019 filed by the respondent.

2. During the pendency of the present appeal the parties have settled their dispute and have filed a joint memo dated 30.07.2026 signed by their respective parties and the learned counsels. The terms of the joint memo reads as under :-

HC-KAR

"JOINT MEMO The WP filed against the award in ID.No.13/2015 dated 31.10.2017 on the file of the Principal District & Session Judge, Davanagere has been settled between the parties on the following terms and the award may kindly be modified as under:

1. The petitioner - Corporation agreed to reinstate the Respondent-workman into service without continuity of service, without consequential benefits, without backwages from the date of dismissal till the date of actual reinstatement as per the order passed in W.P.No.996/2019 c/w 34965/2018.

2. Suspension period will not be treated as on duty and pending default cases if any which are filed will be reopened.

3. The parties to the proceedings have agreed for the above terms."

3. Sri V.S. Naik, learned counsel has filed vakalath for the respondent.

HC-KAR

4. In view of the above joint memo, the appeal stands disposed of.

5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

NG CT:SM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead