Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/564/2026 of SRI. SUSHANTH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010238602026 NC: 2026:KHC:39116 CRL.RP No. 564 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.564 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. SUSHANTH C/O SADANANDA POOJARI AGED ABOUT 33
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.564 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI. SUSHANTH
C/O SADANANDA POOJARI
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
R/AT 1-78 (C), PAPUJE
BOMMARAABETTU
HIRIADKA, UDUPI
KARNATAKA-576113
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOME
2ND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
2. THE SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE
AND SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI -576 101
3. THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR
HIRIYADKA POLICE STATION
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
REPRESENTED BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING
BENGALURU- 560001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS
PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRL.RP AND SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DTD 12.03.2026 IN PROCEEDINGS BEARING
NO.M.A.G.S.R/3/2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2
U/S 55(A) OF K.P ACT, PENDING BEFORE THE SPECIAL
EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE AND SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned Addl. Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would submit that this petition has become infructuous since the period of externment passed is elapsed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also not disputes the same. In view of the said
HC-KAR
submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. In view of dismissal of the main petition, I.A. if any, does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN