Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11761/2025 of SRI MUNAVAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 28 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010533312025 NC: 2026:KHC:39095 CRL.P No. 11761 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11761 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNAVAR S/O LATE MEHABOOB SAB AGED ABOUT 62
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11761 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. MUNAVAR
S/O LATE MEHABOOB SAB
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
2.
SMT. PARVEEN TAJ
W/O ABDUL RAHAMAN SAB,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
HURULUGURKHI VILLAGE,
VENKATAGIRIKOTE,
(P) VIJAYAPURA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK AND
BANGALORE RURAL DIST. - 562 110.
3.
SMT. YASMIN TAJ,
W/O MUBARAK PASHA,
D/O MUNAVAR
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
RESIDING AT AVATHI, KASABA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DIST. - 562 110.
4.
SMT. SAMIN TAJ,
W/O BABAJAN,
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
RESIDING AT MEHABOOB NAGAR,
SIDLAGHATTA,
CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DIST - 562 105.
5.
SMT. NAMID TAJ,
W/O MUBARAK PASHA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 102,
AVALAHALLI, J.P.NAGAR 9TH PHASE,
ANJANAPURA, BANGALORE - 62.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA H.V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BANGALORE DISTRICT WOMEN
POLICE STATION, DODDABALLAPUR,
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
SMT. NEHA KOUSAL,
W/O SALMAN KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HURULUGURKHI VILLAGE,
VENKATAGIRIKOTE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK AND POST - 562110.
BANGALORE RURAL DIST.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.140/2025
REGISTERED BY BANGALORE DISTRICT WOMEN POLICE
STATION DODDABALLAPURA PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., DODDABALLAPURA FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S. 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352, 190 OF BNS 2023
AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT AS CONCERNED TO THE
PETITIONERS FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The undersigned counsel appearing for the petitioners respectfully submits before this Hon'ble Court that the petitioners may kindly be permit to withdraw the petition, as the present petition has become infructuous as charge sheet is filed. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed before this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to accept the
HC-KAR
present withdrawal memo and permit withdrawal of the same reserving liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition if necessary and pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16