Karnataka High Court
WA/1798/2026 of SMT PAVITHRA Vs MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAND AERONAUTICS LIMITED on 28 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010504522026 NC: 2026:KHC:39006-DB WA No. 1798 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 1798 OF 2026 (L-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. PAVITHRA W/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1798 OF 2026 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PAVITHRA
W/O SHRI RAJI NAYAGAM
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. G-234
5TH MAIN ROAD, HAL OLD TOWNSHIP
VIMANAPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 017.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI CLIFTON D'ROZARIO, ADVOCATE A/W
SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAND
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE
AT NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHAIRMAN
AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
THE MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN
AERONAUTICS LIMITED
Digitally signed
by VASANTHA
KUMARY B K
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
THE COMPANY'S ACT, 1956
INDUSTRIAL HEALTH CENTRE
MEDICAL DIVISION
BENGALURU COMPLEX
MARATHAHALLI POST
BENGALURU - 560 037
REPRESENTED BY
THE CHIEF MANAGER (HR).
3.
UNION OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
NO.104, SOUTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI-110 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
4.
MANAGEMENT OF HINDUSTAN
AERONAUTICS LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
REGISTERED AND CORPORATE OFFICE
AT NO.15/1, CUBBON ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001
REPRESENTED BY ITS GM(HR).
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.S.RAMDAS, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI PRADEEP S. SAWKAR, ADVOCATE AND
SRI S.R.KAMALA CHARAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1,R2 & R4; ASG SERVED AND UNPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER
OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 16.07.2026 IN WRIT
HC-KAR
PETITION
NO.3684/2026,
AND
CONSEQUENTLY
REJECT
I.A.NO.2/2026 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
This appeal is taken up for final disposal with the consent of both the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present appeal is filed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge vacating the interim order that had been operating in favour of the appellants for a period of six months. Learned Single Judge vacated the interim order on the ground that the writ petitions were not maintainable in view of the availability of an alternate remedy under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
HC-KAR
3. We are not expressing any opinion on the view taken by the learned Single Judge. However, we are of the considered view that when the writ petitions are still pending adjudication, it would not be appropriate to vacate the interim order at this stage.
4. Accordingly, we dispose of the appeal requesting the learned Single Judge to decide the matter finally preferable as expeditiously as possible may be within a period of two months.
5. The parties are directed to extend full cooperation to facilitate early disposal of the writ petitions and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments before the learned Single Judge.
6. Till the writ petitions are finally decided by the learned Single Judge, the interim order dated 05.02.2026 which was in operation prior to the passing of the impugned order, shall continue to remain in operation.
HC-KAR
7. The parties are at liberty to file further pleadings and take all contentions as may be available under the law.
8. The writ appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4