Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/7124/2026 of SRI G NAGARAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 27 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010337402026 NC: 2026:KHC:38821 CRL.P No. 7124 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7124 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. G. NAGARAJ, S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7124 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. NAGARAJ,
S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KURABAHARAHALLI VILLAGE,
KUMBALAHALLI POST,
HOSAKOTE - 562 114.
AND ALSO PRINCIPAL
SHRI SAI VIDYA DRIVING SCHOOL,
TOWN COLLEGE ROAD,
SIR. M.V. LAYOUT,
HOSAKOTE - 562 114.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR N.D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH K.R.PURAM
POLICE STATION,
REPRESENT BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SRI. G.B.SUDHIR,
S/O. LATE.H.G.B UPAL,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
WORKING AS SENIOR MOTOR
VEHICLE INSPECTOR,
ROAD TRASPORT OFFICE, K.R.PURA,
BENGALURU - 560 049.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS)
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
CHARGE
SHEET
IN
CC
NO.55367/2019 OF K.R.PURAM POLICE STATION PENDING ON
THE X ADDL.METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT MAYOHALL
BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 353, 504, 426, 506 OF
IPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP on instructions would submit that the charges have been framed and the petition would not be entertainable at this juncture.
HC-KAR
2. In the light of the charges being framed, the entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1.
3. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed.
All contentions are left open to be urged before the concerned Court.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29