Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/17670/2025 of VINOD WALTER PINTO Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 27 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010853502025 NC: 2026:KHC:39045 CRL.P No. 17670 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17670 OF 2025 BETWEEN: VINOD WALTER PINTO, S/O IZDORE PINTO, AGED ABOUT 46
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010853502025
NC: 2026:KHC:39045
CRL.P No. 17670 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17670 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
VINOD WALTER PINTO,
S/O IZDORE PINTO,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/NO.15-71B, PANJIBETTU HOUSE,
KARINJE VILLAGE, TACCAODE POST,
KODANGALLU, DAKSHINA KANNADA-574197.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY MOODABIDRE POLICE STATION,
D.K. DISTRICT.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
IVY CRASTA,
W/O JOHN VILSAN PINTO,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO.16/52 (3), HILL CIS,
TACCODE POST, KARINJE VILLAGE,
D.K. DISTRICT-574197.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R-1;
SRI. M.R. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNSS)
CR.P.C TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME
NO.128/2025
REGISTERED
BY
THE
RESPONDENT
MOODABIDRE POLICE FOR THE OFFENCES P/US/ 314, 318(4)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010853502025
NC: 2026:KHC:39045
CRL.P No. 17670 of 2025
OF BNS, 2023 PENDING BEFORE THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
COURT, MOODABIDRI.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
That the learned Counsel for the Petitioner humbly submits that, during the pendency of the above Petition, the Investigating officer has completed the investigation and has filed the charge sheet before the learned Trial Court. In view of the said subsequent development, the present Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit withdrawal of the above Petition and dismiss the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.”
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 63