Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1872/2025 of SRI GANESH Vs SMT. ARUNKUMARI G on 27 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010798502025 NC: 2026:KHC:38608 CRL.RP No. 1872 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1872 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. GANESH, S/O. GUTTEYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1872 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. GANESH,
S/O. GUTTEYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
C/O. MANJUNATH,
7TH CROSS, 60 FEET ROAD,
NEAR PARK, VINOBA NAGAR,
SHIVAMOGGA-577201.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANOJ M. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. ARUNKUMARI G.,
W/O. G.T.SADANANADA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
RESIDING AT CHINMAEE NILAYA,
KASHIPURA GATE,
SOMINAKOPPA ROAD,
VINOBANAGAR,
SHIVAMOGGA-577201.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED
09.10.2024 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND J.M.F.C AT SHIVAMOGGA, IN CRL.CASE NO.810/2021 AND
ACQUIT THE ACCUSED- PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I ACT AND TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT, CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED
06.10.2025 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE,
SHIVAMOGGA
IN
CRL.A.NO.132/2024
DATED
06.10.2025 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER BY ALLOWING THE
RP.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Both the parties and the learned counsel for the revision petitioner are present before the Court. The respondent/complainant produced the Aadhar card and the accused also identified the complainant before the Court. The Aadhar card is ordered to be returned to the respondent/complainant.
2. The matter is settled for an amount of Rs.1,35,000/- as against Rs.1,80,000/-. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner produced the receipt for having deposited an amount of Rs.37,000/- before the Trial Court. The amount of Rs.37,000/- is ordered to be released in favour of the respondent/complainant, on proper identification and the
HC-KAR
revision petitioner has no objection for the same. The revision petitioner has paid the amount of Rs.88,000/- by way of DD and also paid the cash of Rs.10,000/- before the Court and the same is acknowledged by the respondent/complainant. The entire amount of Rs.1,35,000/- is paid to the respondent/complainant, inclusive of the deposit before the Trial Court.
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner also produced the receipt for having made the payment of Rs.5,000/- as ordered by the Trial Court.
4. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties, the criminal revision petition is disposed of and the revision petitioner/accused is acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3