Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/17124/2025 of SHRI. PRAKASH Vs SMT MEGHA on 27 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010822002025 NC: 2026:KHC:38771 CRL.P No. 17124 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17124 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHRI. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010822002025
NC: 2026:KHC:38771
CRL.P No. 17124 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17124 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SHRI. PRAKASH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
S/O.SHIVAYYAKARADI,
OCCUPATION: PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/O SHIVAPARVATI,
TBH COLONY, 2ND CROSS, KUD ROAD,
DHARWAD - 580 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRABHUGOUDA B. TUMBIGI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. MEGHA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
W/O.PRAKASHKARADI,
(MEGHA D/O VEERAYYA
KALAKERIMATH-MAIDEN NAME),
OCCUPATION: PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/O NO.1985/1,
ASHIRWAD NILAYA, FIRST FLOOR,
20TH 'D' CROSS, I MAIN ROAD,
C BLOCK, SAHAKAR NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 092.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.MALLIKARJUNA R.M., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010822002025
NC: 2026:KHC:38771
CRL.P No. 17124 of 2025
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS)
CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 03.11.2025
PASSED ON I.A.NO.I IN CRL.A.NO.1635/2025 BY THE HONBLE
LXIX ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN
CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 24.09.2025 PASSED ON
I.A.NO.I TO III IN CRL.MISC.NO.213/2024 BY THE HONBLE
JMFC (TRAFFIC COURT VI) BENGALURU AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE I.A.NO.I TO III FILED HEREIN.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order that is challenged is an interlocutory order in Crl.A.No.1635/2025, which appeal itself has been terminated.
2. In that light, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy as available in law.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8