Karnataka High Court
WP/17509/2026 of PRAKSH BALAJI S/O RAMU Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 27 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010387842026 NC: 2026:KHC:38820 WP No. 17509 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 17509 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. PRAKSH BALAJI S/O RAMU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/ A
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010387842026
NC: 2026:KHC:38820
WP No. 17509 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 17509 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
PRAKSH BALAJI S/O RAMU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/A 4TH CROSS UTHARAHALLI
BHUVANESHWARINAGAR
BENGALURU-61
(PETITIONER IS IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LIKITHA M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY MARATHAHALLI P S
REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE-560 001
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS
W.P.
IS
FILED
UNDER
ARTICLE
OF
THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (A) ISSUE WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO ISSUE A DIRECTION TO LEARNED XXIX
CHIEF
JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE,
MAYOHALL
BANGALORE
TO
CONCLUDE THE TRIAL IN C.C 56615/2023 WITHIN PERIOD OF
THREE MONTHS. THE COPY OF ENTIRE ORDER SHEET IS PRODUCED
AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE -C AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010387842026
NC: 2026:KHC:38820
WP No. 17509 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking speedy disposal of the proceedings before the concerned Court in the light of it being of the year 2023.
2. Heard Smt. Likitha M, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K. Nageshwarappa, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1.
3. A perusal at the order sheet would indicate that the proceedings are being adjourned without rhyme or reason. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to infuse finality to the proceedings. The concerned Court shall endeavour to conclude the proceedings within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order, if not earlier.
4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
VP