Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1339/2024 of SMT T DEVI Vs SMT ROOJA on 23 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010603042024 NC: 2026:KHC:38102 CRL.RP No. 1339 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1339 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. T. DEVI, W/O. LATE SRI. T. BHUPATHI, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1339 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. T. DEVI,
W/O. LATE SRI. T. BHUPATHI,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/AT NO.10, 12TH CROSS,
HEALTH LAYOUT,
SRI. GANDHADA KAVALU,
NAGARABHAVI,
BENGALURU-560072.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.B.SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SMT. ROOJA,
W/O. SRI. CHETHANA C.,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1314, “GURU VIHAR”,
VISHWESHWARAIAH, 7TH BLOCK,
FURTHER EXTENSION, MUDDINAPALYA,
NEAR NEELAKANTESHWARA TEMPLE ARCH,
BENGALURU - 560050.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S. LAKSHMINARAYANA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF
CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT OF THE 1ST APPELLATE COURT
DATED 05.10.2024 PASSED BY THE 56TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-57) AND THE
JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT DATED 03.10.2023 PASSED
BY THE 36TH ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU CITY IN CC NO.2306/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY
BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is called twice both in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session and there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. Earlier when the matter was referred to the mediation, the case was listed five times for mediation and revision petitioner advocate was present once and parties never appeared and hence, reported as not settled. The matter was referred to the Lok-Adalath on 11.07.2026 and before the Lok-Adalath, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the petitioner were absent. The learned counsel for the respondent and the respondent were present and at the request of the learned counsel for the respondent, the matter was listed before the Lok-Adalath on 18.07.2026. On 18.07.2026, the matter was called thrice and none appeared on
HC-KAR
behalf of the parties and hence, the matter was referred back to the Court.
2. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. Having taken note of all these factors into consideration, even though the matter is listed for admission, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner is not pursuing the matter. No ground is made out to adjourn the matter and hence, the revision petition is dismissed.
3. The Registry is directed to send the lower court records to the Trial Court.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28