Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/483/2025 of S S INDIRA Vs R HALESH @ HALESHAPPA on 23 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010212302025 NC: 2026:KHC:38127 CRL.RP No. 483 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.483 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. S.S. INDIRA W/O NARAYANA SWAMY AGED ABOUT 46
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010212302025
NC: 2026:KHC:38127
CRL.RP No. 483 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.483 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
S.S. INDIRA
W/O NARAYANA SWAMY
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT NO.1ST CROSS
M.V. NAGARATHNAMMA LAYOUT
RAGIGUDDA EXTENSION
SHIVAMOGGA TOWN-577401.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ASHWATH C.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
R. HALESH @ HALESHAPPA
S/O RUDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR
R/AT GONDICHANTNEHALLI VILLAGE
SHIVAMOGGA TALUK-577 401.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRABHA R. GIRIMAJI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 (FILED U/S.438
R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT DATED 01.02.2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE II
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT SHIVAMOGGA IN
CRL.A.NO.23/2024 AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2024
PASSED
BY
THE
HONBLE
JMFC
II
SHIVAMOGGA
IN
C.C.NO.574/2022 AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S/ 138 OF NI ACT.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010212302025
NC: 2026:KHC:38127
CRL.RP No. 483 of 2025
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for admission. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. On perusal of the material on record, no cross- examination of P.W.1, inspite of opportunity is given to the petitioner and also not led any defence evidence and in the reply notice also, it is admitted by the accused that Ex.P1 has been obtained at the instance of her husband. But, the same is not substantiated by cross-examination P.W.1 or leading any defence evidence. When such being the case, I do not find any ground to entertain this revision.
Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41