Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/15214/2025 of RAKESH C R Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010720312025 NC: 2026:KHC:38012 CRL.P No. 15214 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15214 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: 1. RAKESH C R S/O. REVANNA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15214 OF 2025
(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-)
BETWEEN:
1.
RAKESH C R
S/O. REVANNA
AGED ABOUT 3O YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 210,
CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI,
TAVAREKERE HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.
2.
KARTHIK K.,
S/O. KADAIAH
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS,
NEAR SHAKARNAG BUS STOP,
KAMALANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 079.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA B.V., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
PADMAVATHI B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION
BENGALURU CITY.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX,
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
P. RAGHUNATHACHARI
S/O. LATE. CHINNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.30,
2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
VENKATAPPA LAYOUT,
BENGALURU 560064.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.34909/2025
(ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.25/2024) OF CYBER CRIME P.S. FOR
THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 419, 420 OF IPC AND SEC.66(c)
66(d) OF I.T ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE XLV
A.C.J.M AT BENGALURU CITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CRIMINAL PETITION
The Petitioners above-named respectfully submits as follows:
1. That the Petitioners has filed the above Criminal Petition seeking the Quash the entire proceedings in C.C. No.34909/2025 pending on the file of Hon'ble XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bengaluru City."
2. That due to certain inadvertent clerical and technical errors in the pleadings and annexures of the present petition, the Petitioners seeks permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with liberty to fie a fresh petition on the same cause of action after rectifying the said errors.
3. That the withdrawal of the present petition is in the interest of justice and no hardship or prejudice will be caused to the Respondents."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37