Karnataka High Court
CCC/1235/2025 of SRI NIRMAL KUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010619962025 NC: 2026:KHC:37831-DB CCC No. 1235 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1235 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1235 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI NIRMAL KUMAR
S/O. LATE K.SEENIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS-NO.673,
GROUND FLOOR 17 D, CROSS,
INDIRANAGAR RAMAKRISHNA
NAGAR 2ND STAGE
BANGALORE-560020
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTATIVE BY ITS SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL CELL)
M.S.BUILDING
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
...PROFORMA RESPONDENT
2.
SRI.SHANMUK.D
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/
COMPETENT AUTHORITY APPOINTMENT
Digitally
signed by K
P SWETHA
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
BY THE GOVT UNDER SECTION
5 OF THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION
OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN
FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT 2004
SHANATINAGAR,
BMTC BUS STOP, 2ND FLOOR
BANGALORE-560027.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R1
SRI. VEERESH R BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR A2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST
ACCUSED NO.2 DISOBEY THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2024
PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.4003/2024.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The complainant has filed a present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 26.09.2024, whereby a batch of petitions were disposed of with a direction to the accused to consider the claim applications submitted by the writ
HC-KAR
petitioners including the complainant and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
2. Accused No.2/respondent No.2 (competent authority) has filed a compliance affidavit inter alia stating that notices dated 22.1.2025 have been issued to various applicants and that the claim will be considered in accordance with law. He further submits that there are some matters where stay order has been granted in regard to the proceedings. Subject to there being no such impediment, the complainant's claim would be considered.
3. In view of the above, the complaint is closed with liberty to the complainant to revive the same.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1