Karnataka High Court
WP/19085/2026 of MR. SRINIVAS KR AITHAL Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 22 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010417422026 NC: 2026:KHC:37876 WP No. 19085 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19085 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SRINIVAS KR AITHAL, S/O SHRI. RAMESH K R, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 19085 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. SRINIVAS KR AITHAL,
S/O SHRI. RAMESH K R,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.12,
MD LAYOUT, HANUMANTHNAGAR,
BENGALURU-560001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ANUSH N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU,
REP BY H.C.G.P,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
MR.FRANCIS PAUL,
S/O SUSAINATHAN,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY OF
EIPR INDIA PVT LTD, NO.13,
3RD FLOOR, 6TH BLOCK, 60FT ROAD,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU-56000.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION
482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO
QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C NO. 48192/2025 ARISING
OUT OF CRIME NO.333/2025 OF JAYANAGAR P.S FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC. 51(A), 51(B), 63 OF
COPYRIGHT ACT ARRAIGNING THE PRESENT PETITIONER AS
THE ONLY ACCUSED PENDING ON THE FILE OF IX ADDNL. CJM
COURT AT BANGALORE (VIDE ANNEXURE-D) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The Petitioner in the above case humbly submits that due to subsequent developments and for additional grounds, the Petitioner is not willing to proceed with the matter. Hence, the above matter may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn."
HC-KAR
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 3 Sl No.: 12