Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1061/2026 of MANIKANTA H B Vs SMT SHEELA P on 21 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010443932026 NC: 2026:KHC:37298 CRL.RP No. 1061 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1061 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. MANIKANTA H.B., S/O LATE BETTE GOWDA, AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010443932026
NC: 2026:KHC:37298
CRL.RP No. 1061 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1061 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
MANIKANTA H.B.,
S/O LATE BETTE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT NO.488, 1ST CROSS, 9TH MAIN,
BHUVANESHWARINAGARA,
T. DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-57.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AMBARISHA N., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SMT. SHEELA P.,
W/O RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT NO.S-1197, 11TH 'C' ROAD,
NEAR KARNATAKA BANK,
BHARATHNAGAR,
BEL LAYOUT, II STAGE,
BENGALURU-560091.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401
(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE SAME AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT DATED 15.11.2018 IN
C.C.NO.11820/2016 PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF XXVI
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010443932026
NC: 2026:KHC:37298
CRL.RP No. 1061 of 2026
ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU AND ALLOW THE COMPLIANT OF THE
PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter was listed on 09.07.2026 and the matter was called twice both in the morning session and in the afternoon session and there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. However, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity was given and the same is not utilized by the revision petitioner. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. The revision petition is not maintainable in view of acquittal order passed by the Trial Court. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7