Karnataka High Court
WA/840/2026 of SRIKANTH NAYAK Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010180642026 NC: 2026:KHC:37417-DB WA No. 840 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 840 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SRIKANTH NAYAK, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
WRIT APPEAL NO. 840 OF 2026 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRIKANTH NAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
S/O A.RAMACHANDRA NAYAK,
R/AT KELAPETE,
SIDDAPURA VILLAGE,
KUNDAPURA TALUK,
UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 229.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,
SIDDAPURA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
SIDDAPURA VILLAGE,
KUNDAPURA TALUK - 576 229.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1)
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT,1961 PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
WRIT APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED:10.02.2026 PASSED IN WP NO.3565/2026 BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AS
PRAYED FOR BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) After arguing the matter forcefully for quite some time, when this Court expressed its firm view to dismiss the appeal with cost, with a liberty to the State to prosecute the appellant, learned counsel Sri.Sudesh Kumar Acharya, appearing for the appellant submits that he would like to withdraw the appeal.
HC-KAR
In due deference to the opinion expressed by learned counsel for the appellant, we allow him to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4 ct-vn