Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/1200/2026 of SRI. MUNIYAPPA @ VARADARAJU @ APPI Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 21 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010478142026 NC: 2026:KHC:37295 CRL.A No. 1200 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1200 OF 2026 (C-) BETWEEN: SRI. MUNIYAPPA @ VARADARAJU @ APPI S/O LATE. VENKATAPPA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1200 OF 2026 (C-)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MUNIYAPPA @ VARADARAJU @ APPI
S/O LATE. VENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT: VADERAHALLI VILLAGE,
KENGERI HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU DISTRICT-560074
(NOW PRESENTLY AT CENTRAL PRISON,
BENGALURU).
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY
KAGGALIPURA POLICE STATION,
THROUGH THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
SRI. VASANTHA,
W/O RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
VICTIM GIRL REPRESENTED BY
NATURAL GUARDIAN,
R/AT: KAGGALIPURA COLONY,
UTTARAHALLI HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560082.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAVEED .S, HCGP)
THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 374(2) CR.PC (FILED U/S 415(2)
BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT
HC-KAR
THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION :18.12.2025 AND THE ORDER OF
SENTENCE DATED :19.12.2025 PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.191/2015
BY THE HON’BLE COURT OF THE ADDL.DIST AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, FTSC COURT 1 BENGALURU RURAL DIST. FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 366 OF IPC AND SEC.6 OF POCSO ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. This criminal appeal is not maintainable for the reasons that the same accused has already filed an appeal in Crl.A.No.730/2026 arising out of Spl.C.No.191/2015.
2. Considering the same, the office objection raised by the Registry is sustained and this criminal appeal stands dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM/-