Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/988/2024 of SRI SYED MUNAWAR PASHA Vs SRI ABDUL SUBHAN on 21 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010150402024 NC: 2026:KHC:37325 CRL.A No. 988 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 988 OF 2024 ( A -) BETWEEN: SRI SYED MUNAWAR PASHA S/O LATE MUNAWAR PASHA AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010150402024
NC: 2026:KHC:37325
CRL.A No. 988 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 988 OF 2024 (A-)
BETWEEN:
SRI SYED MUNAWAR PASHA
S/O LATE MUNAWAR PASHA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT D.NO.42/3, VEENESHESHANNA
2ND CROSS, K.R.MOHALLA
MYSORE - 570004
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SYED AMEER.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. ABDUL SUBHAN
S/O LATE GULAM DASTAGIR
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT D.NO.316, 7TH CROSS
SIDDIQUE NAGAR
MYSURU - 570015
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378 (G) OF CR.P.C. BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE
COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 31.01.2024 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU IN CRL.A.NO.324/2023
Digitally
signed by
SUSHMA
LAKSHMI B
S
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010150402024
NC: 2026:KHC:37325
CRL.A No. 988 of 2024
AND BE FURTHER PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE SAID ORDER, WHILE
CONFIRMING
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
AND
ORDER
OF SENTENCE DATED 21.08.2023 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC AT MYSURU IN C.C.NO.1660/2020 WHEREIN THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED WAS FOUND GUILTY OF OFFENCE P/US/.138 OF NI ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Despite giving sufficient opportunities learned counsel for the appellant has not complied with the office objections.
2. Accordingly, this criminal appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM/-