Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4291/2024 of SWAPNIL SHUKLA Vs STATE BY BOMMANAHALLI PS on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010273822024 NC: 2026:KHC:37221 CRL.P No. 4291 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4291 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SWAPNIL SHUKLA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O KRISHNA KUMAR
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010273822024
NC: 2026:KHC:37221
CRL.P No. 4291 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4291 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SWAPNIL SHUKLA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
S/O KRISHNA KUMAR SHUKLA
R/O NO. KA-2501
SALARAPURIYA GREENAGE APARTMENT
BOMMANAHALLI, BENGALURU CITY
KARNATAKA - BANGALORE-560068
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: KAVERI P CHINCHOLI.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY BOMMANAHALLI PS
REP. BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560001.
2.
SEEMANTHIKA MALKOTIYA
R/O NO KA-2501
SALARPURIYA GREENAGE APARTMENT
BOMMANAHALLI
BANGALORE-560068
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT: WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010273822024
NC: 2026:KHC:37221
CRL.P No. 4291 of 2024
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC BY THE
PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR NO.414/2023
DATED 04.11.2023 FILED AGAINST THE PETITIONER BY THE
RESPONDENTS UNDER SECTIONS 454, 380 OF IPC AS ILLEGAL
AND AMOUNTS TO ABUSE THE PROCESS OF LAW.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2024, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 75