Karnataka High Court
WP/19549/2026 of PRAKASH BALAJI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010429112026 NC: 2026:KHC:37252 WP No. 19549 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19549 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: PRAKASH BALAJI S/O RAMU AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/ A 4TH
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010429112026
NC: 2026:KHC:37252
WP No. 19549 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 19549 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
PRAKASH BALAJI
S/O RAMU
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R/A 4TH CROSS UTHARAHALLI,
BHUVANESHWARINAGAR, BENGALURU - 61.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKSHITH R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY MICO LAYOUT PS
REP. BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTTUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS TO ISSUE A
DIRECTION TO III ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL TO
CONCLUDE THE TRIAL IN CC.NO.947/2012 WITHIN PERIOD OF
THREE MONTHS. THE COPY OF ENTIRE ORDER SHEET IS
PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE 'C' AND ETC.,
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010429112026
NC: 2026:KHC:37252
WP No. 19549 of 2026
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner-accused has sought for speedy disposal of the proceedings before the concerned Court in the light of it being of the year 2012.
2. A perusal at the order sheet would indicate that the proceedings are being adjourned without rhyme or reason. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to infuse finality to the proceedings. The concerned Court shall endeavour to conclude the proceedings within the outer limit of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the Order, if not earlier.
3. Accordingly, the petition stand disposed of.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 42