Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/17211/2025 of SRI JAYACHANDRA SHARMA P Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010825072025 NC: 2026:KHC:37208 CRL.P No. 17211 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17211 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAYACHANDRA SHARMA P S/O PARAMASHIVAIAH AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 17211 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI JAYACHANDRA SHARMA P
S/O PARAMASHIVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
GOWDANAKATTE, MATHIHALLI POST
KASABA HOBALI, TIPTUR RURAL
KOTANAYAKANHALLI
TUMKUR KARNATAKA- 572201
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT: BELLE R.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY TIPTUR RURAL POLICE STATION
BANGALORE HONAVAR ROAD
TUMKUR-572201.
2.
GANGADHARAIAH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
BENNAYAKANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI TIPTUR TALUK
TUMKUR
3.
KANTHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
BENNAYAKANAHALLI
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KASABA HOBLI
TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKUR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT: DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNNS) BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.0068/2023 DATED 30.07.2023
VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN
REGISTERED AT TIPTUR RURAL POLICE STATION PENDING ON
THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC TIPTUR FOR THE
OFFENCES THAT ARE MADE UNDER SECTIONS 323, 504, 506, 354(B) OF IPC.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on three occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the
HC-KAR
petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 90