Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11968/2024 of SENDIL KUMAR A Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010625862024 NC: 2026:KHC:37219 CRL.P No. 11968 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11968 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SENDIL KUMAR A SON OF ASHOKAN AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11968 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SENDIL KUMAR A
SON OF ASHOKAN
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
NO. 163, 3RD CROSS
4TH MAIN, A.K. COLONY
D.J. HALLI, BANGALORE
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: P SRINIVAS KUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY J.C.NAGAR POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU -560 001
2.
SMT.PAVITHRA.R
DAUGHTER OF LATE M.B.RAMACHANDRAN
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
NO.55, NANDI DURGA ROAD
BANGALORE
AND ALSO NO.33
13TH CROSS, AECS LAYOUT
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
SANJAYANAGAR
BANGALROE -560 094
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT: WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE PETITIONER
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
IN
C.C.NO.20706/2024 (CRIME NO.23/2024) FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 441, 447, 149, 148, 143, 504, 506 OF IPC REGISTERED BY 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL CHIEF
METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE,
AT
BENGALURU
VIDE
ANNEXURE-A.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2024, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the
HC-KAR
petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 77