Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5301/2024 of MR SANJI PAUL ARVIND Vs STATE BY VIVEK NAGAR POLICE STATION on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010304992024 NC: 2026:KHC:37220 CRL.P No. 5301 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5301 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR SANJI PAUL ARVIND AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SON OF
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5301 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
MR SANJI PAUL ARVIND
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
SON OF STEVAN ALIAS FRANCIS XAVIER
RESIDING AT NO. 40
4TH CROSS
NISSAN HOUSE
AUTIN TOWN
BANGALORE-560047.
2.
MRS JOYCEE RANI
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
WIFE OF SANJI PAUL ARVIND
RESIDING AT NO. 40
4TH CROSS
NISSAN HOUSE
AUTIN TOWN
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI: GOPAL N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY VIVEK NAGAR POLICE STATION
BANGALORE
(BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR).
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SMT MARIA AGNES PRIYA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
WIFE OF RAMESH
RESIDING AT NO. 23/1
K N 3RD STREET
ASHOK NAGAR
BANGALORE-560025.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT: WAHEEDA M M, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY
THE
PETITIONER
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM IN FIR NO.70/2024 ON THE
FILE OF THE VIVEK NAGAR POLICE PENDING BEFORE THE 29tH
ACMM AT BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 354, 504, 341, 323, 324 READ WITH SECTION 34
OF IPC.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2024, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions.
HC-KAR
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioners to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 76