Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9645/2025 of SRI NAFIH MOHAMMED NASEER Vs FARAZ PASHA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010446742025 NC: 2026:KHC:37213 CRL.P No. 9645 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9645 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI NAFIH MOHAMMED NASEER S/O. MOHAMMED ABDUL NASER
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010446742025
NC: 2026:KHC:37213
CRL.P No. 9645 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9645 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI NAFIH MOHAMMED NASEER
S/O. MOHAMMED ABDUL NASER
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
NO. 18, 3RD FLOOR
ALEXANDRIA STREET
ABOVE ROYAL SUPER MARKET
BENGALURU - PIN 560 025
RESIDING AT
ZUBEDA RESIDENCY
NO.3, FLAT NO.301
LAUREL LANE
RICHMOND TOWN
BENGALURU - PIN 560 025.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: ANJAN KUMAR T.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
FARAZ PASHA
S/O. SHAKEEL PASHA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R/AT. NO. 11, ASHIYANA
LEOARD LANE, RICHMOND TOWN,
BENGALURU.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010446742025
NC: 2026:KHC:37213
CRL.P No. 9645 of 2025
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482(FILED UNDER
SECTION 528 BNSS) CR.P.C BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS ON THE FILE OF THE 16TH
A.C.J.M BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.21218/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I ACT.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on six occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 83