Karnataka High Court
WP/34957/2025 of SMT USHARANI N Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010743012025 NC: 2026:KHC:37204 WP No. 34957 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 34957 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT USHARANI N W/O SRI PRAVEENKUMAR R AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 34957 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT USHARANI N
W/O SRI PRAVEENKUMAR R
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O NO.18, 5TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS
BABANNA LAYOUT, MALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-560073
2.
SRI N AMRUTH RAJ
S/O C.S NAGARAJ
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
RESIDING AT 28/2, 1ST FLOOR
HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD
UCO BANK MEI LAYOUT
BAGALAGUNTE
BENGALURU-560073
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI: CHETHAN B C.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BAGALAGUNTE PS
BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
SHUBHA
W/O NAVEED
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
RAT NO 2078,1ST MAIN
4TH CROSS, AK COLONY
GEDDALAHALLI
BENGALURU-562149
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT: DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 582 OF
BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO-QUASH THE FIR ORDER DATED
23.10.2025 REGISTERED IN THE BAGALAGUNTE POLICE
STATION IN CR NO. 0421/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS WP, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on five occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the
HC-KAR
petitioners to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 93