Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9185/2025 of MR SUJITH SUDHAKARAN Vs MR EUGENE PRABHU on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010422582025 NC: 2026:KHC:37214 CRL.P No. 9185 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9185 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR SUJITH SUDHAKARAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ADDITIONAL
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9185 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
MR SUJITH SUDHAKARAN
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
DREAMZ INFRA INDIA LTD
NO.577/B, 2ND FLOOR
OUTER RING ROAD
TEACHERS COLONY
KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560034
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.831
DIVYA YOSHITHA
NEAR TO HSR CLUB
1ST FLOOR 23RD CROSS
16TH MAIN, 3RD SECTOR
BENGALURU 560 102
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: PRAKASH B N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR EUGENE PRABHU
S/O LATE CAPT. JAMES REAGIS
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT NO. 84, 1ST FLOOR
SRI. AYYA MATHA TEMPLE STREET
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KSFC LAYOUT
LINGARAJAPURAM
BENGALURU 560 084
…RESPONDENT
(SRI: EUGENE PRABHU, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNSS) BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER
HEREIN (ACCUSED NO.6 IN THE COMPLAINT), INITIATED VIDE
ORDER DATED 07.01.2017 IN C.C NO.50241/2017, PENDING
ON THE FILE OF 33RD ACMM COURT, BENGALURU.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on six occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the
HC-KAR
petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 82