Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10210/2026 of SRI LOKESH M Vs SMT. DEEPIKA B on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010474972026 NC: 2026:KHC:37253 CRL.P No. 10210 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10210 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. LOKESH M S/O.LATE.MUNIAJANAPPA, AGE ABOUT 47
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10210 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI. LOKESH M
S/O.LATE.MUNIAJANAPPA,
AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.18,
NEW NO.216, JANATHA COLONY,
GIDADA KONENAHALLI VILALGE,
VISWANEEDAM POST,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. DEEPIKA B
W/O.LOKESH.M,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
2.
KUM. JANIKA.L,
D/O.LOKESH.M,
AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS,
3.
MASTER.CHIRAAG.L,
S/O.LOKESH.M,
AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 ARE
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
RESIDING AT NO.130,
KURUBARAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM (VHBCS LAYOUT) POST,
BANGALORE - 560 086
RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE
MINOR AND THE 1ST RESPONDENT
REPRESENTED THE MINOR
AS A NATURAL GUARDIAN.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 03.05.2025
PASSED BY THE LRD. CJM COURT OF BANGALORE RURAL IN
CRL.MISC.NO.534/2025 IN GRANTING EX PARTE INTERIM
MAINTENANCE
TO
THE
RESPONDENT
DIRECTING
THE
PETITIONER TO PAY THE RS.20,000/- TO 1ST RESPONDENT
AND PAY RS.10,000/- EACH TO 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENT/
EACH TO BOTH CHILDREN.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
HC-KAR
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The undersigned counsel for the petitioner herewith submits that the order that is challenged before this Court is ex-parte interim maintenance ordered by Hon'ble Trial Court. Hence the proper forum is to seek modification or set aside application before the Hon'ble Trial court. Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays before this Hon'ble Court to kindly consider this memo on record and withdraw/not-pressed the above petition with the liberty to file fresh petition at appropriate circumstances and with the permission to file a fresh application before the Hon'ble Trial Court in the interest of justice. "
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 54