Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/5210/2025 of SANJEY SHET Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010236142025 NC: 2026:KHC:37217 CRL.P No. 5210 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5210 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. 2. SANJEY SHET S/O LATE PRAKESH SHET AGE 43 YEARS OCC
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5210 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
2.
SANJEY SHET
S/O LATE PRAKESH SHET
AGE 43 YEARS
OCC BUSINESS.
R/O, VISHWAMBRA BUILDING
BHARATH NAGAR
SHAHAPUR DIST
BELAGAVI - PIN CODE 590003.
SANTOSH SHET
S/O, SUDHAKAR SHET
AGE 40 YEARS
OCC GOLD SMITH
R/O MASUR CROSS
NEAR GOVT PRIMARY SCHOOL
JANATHA PLOT, HOLANAJADDI VILLAGE
TQ, KUMTA DIST, KARWAR
PIN CODE 581351.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI: MAHANTESH HIREMATH S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH PADUBIDRI POLICE STATION
REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE
2.
DEEPAK SALIAN
S/O SADANAND SALIAN
AGE: 37 YEARS
OCC: BANK EMPLOYEE
R/O INCHARGE CEO OF PADUBIDI C A
SOCIETY PADUBIDI NADAL VILLAGE
KAUP TALUK
AITHU NIVASA
SHIRVA VILLAGE
KAUP TALUK, UDUPI
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNNS) BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE FIR NO.36/24 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 406, 420, 34 IPC IN RESPECT ACCUSED
NO.5 TO 6 PENDING ON THE FILE OF C/C II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC UDUPI.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions.
HC-KAR
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioners to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 79