Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/15575/2025 of NAYAZ AHAMED @ NAYAZ KHAN Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010738802025 NC: 2026:KHC:37210 CRL.P No. 15575 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15575 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. NAYAZ AHAMED @ NAYAZ KHAN S/O SAMIUALLA AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15575 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
NAYAZ AHAMED @ NAYAZ KHAN
S/O SAMIUALLA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/A CHIKKANHALLI POST
KORATGERE TALUK
CHIKKANAHALLI
TUMKUR KARNATAKA-572121
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: OMAR SHARIFF.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR
BANASHANKARI POLICE STATION
BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU - 560070
2.
LAKSHMI RAMANNA
W/O LATE D RAMANNA
R/A 2092, 24TH CROSS
5TH MAIN BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU 50070
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI: K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNNS) BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN S.C.NO.986/2023
(ARISING
OUT
OF
FIR
NO.178/2011)
REGISTERED
AT
BANASHANKARI P.S. BENGALURU CITY PENDING BEFORE THE
HONBLE 63RD ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN SO FAR AS THEY RELATE TO THE PETITIONER
(ACCUSED NO.4) ON THE GROUND THAT THE PROLONGED
PENDENCY OF PROCEEDINGS FOR OVER A DECADE AMOUNTS
TO A VIOLATION OF THE PETITIONERS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT
TO A SPEEDY TRIAL GUARANTEED UNDER ARTICLE 21 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on four occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the
HC-KAR
petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 88