Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2976/2024 of SMT. ANITHALAKSHMI Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010165082024 NC: 2026:KHC:37235 CRL.P No. 2976 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2976 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANITHALAKSHMI W/O NANDISH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2976 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. ANITHALAKSHMI
W/O NANDISH
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/AT CHAMUNDIPURA
SANJEEVINI LAYOUT
2.
NANDISH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT CHAMUNDIPURA
SANJEEVINI LAYOUT
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI: JAYARAMU S K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY IJOOR POLICE STATION
RAMANGARA TOWN
REPRESENTED BY
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560 001
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
SONY M S
W/O MANJUNATH K
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
R/AT NO. 105, 2nd CROSS
BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR
NEAR RAYARADODDI
WARD NO.27
MAGADI ROAD
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT: RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDE SECTION 482 CR.P.C BY THE
PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.89/2023
DATED 15.07.2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTIONS 406, 420, 504, 506 READ WITH 34 OF IPC OF IJOOR
POLICE, RAMANAGARA TOWN ANNEXURE-A, WHICH IS NOW
PENDING BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
J.M.F.C., RAMANAGARA.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2024, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions.
HC-KAR
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioners to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 72