Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/8813/2025 of SMT VIDYAVATHI A BHAT Vs SRI DEEPAK KUMAR SHETTY on 20 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010403702025 NC: 2026:KHC:37215 CRL.P No. 8813 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8813 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT VIDYAVATHI A BHAT W/O ASHOK BHAT AGED ABOUT 51
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010403702025
NC: 2026:KHC:37215
CRL.P No. 8813 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8813 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT VIDYAVATHI A BHAT
W/O ASHOK BHAT
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/AT IDDYA HOUSE
MANGALURU CITY
KARNATAKA-575014
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: ARVIND N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI DEEPAK KUMAR SHETTY
S/O SRI BALAKRISHNA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
PROPRIETOR M/S. DEEPAK WINES
R/AT D.NO.1-8, KULAI POST
MRPL ROAD, KANA
MANGALORE
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI: K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED
UNDER SECTION 528 BNSS) BY THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO
MODIFY THE ORDER DATED 30.12.2024 PASSED BY II
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010403702025
NC: 2026:KHC:37215
CRL.P No. 8813 of 2025
ADDL.DIST.AND SESSION COURT IN CRL.A NO.390/2024 FROM
20 PERCENT TO 5 PERCENT OF THE CHEQUE AMOUNT
(ANNEXURE A). AND ALLOW THE PETITION.
THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2025, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on seven occasions.
2. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BGN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 81