Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10409/2026 of SRI.PRADEEP ACHARYA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010479152026 NC: 2026:KHC:36914 CRL.P No. 10409 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10409 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI PRADEEP ACHARYA, S/O PRABHAKAR ACHARYA, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10409 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI PRADEEP ACHARYA,
S/O PRABHAKAR ACHARYA,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT AMMA NILAYA, KILU,
NAMBIYAR COMPOUND,
ALSO AT NITTOOL ROAD,
MUDUBELLE POST, BELLE,
NOODUBELLE, UDUPI,
KARNATAKA-576420.
2.
SMT. DAYAVANTHI A,
W/O ANAND G MAINDAN,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT “SANGVI”, MALPE,
KODAVOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI,
KARNATAKA.
ALSO AT 12-92 A 8 SANGHVI,
SALMARA KODAVOOR, TENKANIDYOOR,
PO; KRODASHRAMA, UDUPI- 576106.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI THANOJ KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY MALPE POLICE STATION,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
UDUPI DISTRICT,
THROUGH THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU 560001.
2.
SRI INDIRA BANGERA,
S/O SANJEEVA MENDON,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
OCCUPATION :FISHERMAN,
R/AT KODIBENGRE, KODI VILLAGE,
UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT,
KARNATAKA 576217.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.76/2026 REGISTERED
BY MALPE POLICE STATION, UDUPI DISTRICT, PENDING ON
THE
FILE
OF
THE
BEFORE
THE
HON’BLE
COURT
OF
PRL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, UDUPI FOR THE OFFENCES
P/U/S 3(5), 316(2) AND 318(4) OF THE BNS 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
HC-KAR
2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO “The undersigned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, if necessary, in accordance with law.”
In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as withdrawn. I.A.1/2026 is also disposed, as a consequence.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20