Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6986/2025 of MADHU N Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010324512025 NC: 2026:KHC:36911 CRL.P No. 6986 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6986 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MADHU N, S/O NANJUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6986 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
MADHU N,
S/O NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NO.56 DODDA HEGADE,
SIDIHOSKOTE, ANEKAL,
BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA- 560064.
[NAME IN FIR
MADHU GOWDA DODDA HAGADE]
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI S SHANKARAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
THROUGH ANEKAL P.S,
REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BANGALORE- 560001.
2.
SMT. SARASWATHAMMA,
W/O LATE SRINIVAS,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
NO.3, HOSUR MAIN ROAD,
SAPTHAGIRI LAYOUT,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
ANEKAL-560 064.
[AMENDED AS PER ORDER DATED 20.05.2025]
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R-1;
SRI ANAND R.V, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 CR.P.C (U/S 482 BNSS) TO
ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN
CR.NO.100/2025 OF ANEKAL P.S., ON THE FILE OF III ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT ANEKAL, FOR THE
OFFENCES P/U/S 108 R/W 3(5) OF BNS, 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO
The counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the instructions of the petitioner, the counsel maybe permitted to withdraw this criminal petition as in the connected matter in CrL.P.No.7471/2025, this Hon'ble court has granted stay, hence there is no apprehension of arrest. Wherefore, prays that this Hon'ble Court may kindly consider and permit the counsel to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice.”
HC-KAR
In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8