Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/574/2026 of SRI VIJAY NAIK Vs UDAY SHETTY on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010243832026 NC: 2026:KHC:36658 CRL.RP No. 574 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.574 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI VIJAY NAIK AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O PRABHAKAR

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.574 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

SRI VIJAY NAIK

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

S/O PRABHAKAR NAIK

RESIDLING AT MARJI

AJRI VILLAGE AND POST

KUNDAPURA TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576283

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

UDAY SHETTY

S/O THEJAPPA SHETTY

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

RAT AJRI POST AND VILLAGE

KUNDAPURA TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. JEEVAN K, ADVOCATE)

This CRL.RP is FILED U/S. 438 r/w 442 of BNSS PRAYING

TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION ORDER

DATED 12.02.2025 MADE IN C.C.NO.309/2023 BY THE II

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA AND etc

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR admission, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner and respondent are present before the Court.

2. The learned counsel for the respective parties filed I.A.No.2/2026 under Section 147 of N.I. Act read with Section 359 of BNSS stating that the petitioner and the respondent have settled the matter for a sum of Rs.2,35,000/- as full and final settlement. The petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs.2,02,500/- before the Trial Court. The petitioner has no objection to withdraw the said amount. The remaining amount of Rs.32,500/- is paid to the respondent and the same is acknowledged by the respondent.

3. With regard to the settlement, separate affidavits has been filed by the respective parties acknowledging the same. Hence, parties are permitted to compound the offence in view of the settlement between them and payment of

HC-KAR

amount. Hence, petitioner/accused is acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

4. The respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount in deposit before the Trial Court.

5. The petitioner is given time of two weeks to pay the fine of Rs.5,000/- before the Trial Court and directed to produce the receipt of the same within a week thereafter in the registry.

6. If the petitioner failed to produce the receipt for having paid the fine amount within the stipulated time in the registry, list the matter before the Court on 07.08.2026.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead