Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1123/2026 of M/S. NANDHINI BUILDERS PVT. LTD., Vs SRI S. CHINNA SWAMY, on 17 July 2026
CNR: KAHC010476662026 NC: 2026:KHC:36652 CRL.RP No. 1123 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1123 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. NANDHINI BUILDERS PVT. LTD., OFFICE AT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010476662026
NC: 2026:KHC:36652
CRL.RP No. 1123 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1123 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. NANDHINI BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,
OFFICE AT NO.114/2
LALBAGH PORT ROAD
MINERVA CIRCLE
BENGALURU-560 002
REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR
MR. RUPESH ANAND
2.
MR. RUPESH ANAND
S/O LATE ANAND
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
OFFICE AT NO.114/2
LALBAGH PORT ROAD
MINERVA CIRCLE
BENGALURU-560 002
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. NARASIMHARAJU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI S. CHINNA SWAMY
S/O LATE SALLAPURIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/AT SAMPIGE NAGAR
KAMMASANDRA
ELECTRONIC CITY POST
BENGALURU-560 100
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010476662026
NC: 2026:KHC:36652
CRL.RP No. 1123 of 2026
This CRL.RP is FILED U/S 397 and 399 of CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.03.2026 IN CRL.A
NO.5003/2026 PASSED BY THE III ADDL.DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, ANEKAL ON THE APPLICATION FILED U/S
389(1) OF Cr.P.C. and etc.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR orders, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition. The said memo is taken on record. In view of the said memo, the counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty as sought for. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/ (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN